I can’t remember exactly why, but I had occasion last weekend to reread a presentation that Steve Strongin of Goldman Sachs gave at one of our conferences about a year ago. I was impressed with it when I saw and read it at the time, but time has only improved my understanding of just how good it was – and is. So, if you want to read perhaps the best summary of what has gone right and wrong with post-crisis regulation, and an approach to deciding what rules should be kept and what rules discarded or modified, I’d encourage you to spend some time with it.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Bank Capital and Stress Testing
Basel Finalization: The History and Implications for Capital Regulation – Part III
Bank Capital and Stress Testing
Basel Finalization: The History and Implications for Capital Regulation – Part II
Bank Capital and Stress Testing
Basel Finalization: The History and Implications for Capital Regulation – Part I
Bank Capital and Stress Testing
Governance and Authority of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
More Posts by This Author
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions
Russian Oligarchs Hide Money in U.S. Only Reliable Data Can Stop Them.
Bank Capital and Stress Testing
As U.S. Regulators Implement the 2017 Basel Accord, It’s Time for a Reality-Based Assessment of Current Capital Levels