I can’t remember exactly why, but I had occasion last weekend to reread a presentation that Steve Strongin of Goldman Sachs gave at one of our conferences about a year ago. I was impressed with it when I saw and read it at the time, but time has only improved my understanding of just how good it was – and is. So, if you want to read perhaps the best summary of what has gone right and wrong with post-crisis regulation, and an approach to deciding what rules should be kept and what rules discarded or modified, I’d encourage you to spend some time with it.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Bank Capital and Stress Testing The Farmer and the Seed Corn: Why Lowering the CCyB and Imposing Dividend Restrictions Are Opposites
FinTech & Innovation Is It OK for FinTechs To Use Regulatory Arbitrage To Avoid Consolidated Supervision?
Consumer Affairs Alleged PPP Scammers Steered Clear of Large Banks: An Analysis of the DOJ’s Reported Cases to Date
Bank Capital and Stress Testing The Federal Reserve’s Capital Buffer Framework Effectively Constrains Bank Dividends in Stress
More Posts by This Author
FinTech & Innovation FinTech and Big Tech Companies Want the Benefits of Banking Without the Responsibilities. Regulatory Loopholes Could Let Them Succeed.
Bank Capital and Stress Testing What Is Next for Capital Regulation? Hard Choices About Dynamism and Procyclicality
Bank Capital and Stress Testing Operational Risk and the Federal Reserve’s Stress Test: Time for a Reality Check?
Bank Capital and Stress Testing Some Thoughts on the Bank Regulatory Picture: Dividends, CECL, Buffers and the Rest