The Clearing House (TCH) filed a comment letter with the BIS Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) responding to its recent report providing technical measures to address reductions in correspondent banking. In the letter, TCH agreed that technical improvements to information sharing and similar anti-money laundering (AML) and counterterrorism financing tools may be helpful in improving access to correspondent banking services. However, TCH also stressed that it is just as important that policymakers and banks work together to better and more clearly define the roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders – including governments, supervisors and banks – for detecting, reporting and preventing money laundering through the global correspondent banking network. “This is not a simple question of compliance costs. What is also needed is for the public and private sectors to collectively reconsider regulatory requirements and supervisory expectations that are not reducing systemic AML/CFT risk but increasingly making it difficult, and in some cases effectively impossible, for correspondent banks to serve certain kinds of customers and markets,” said TCH’s General Counsel Jeremy Newell.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI and ABA Respond to FinCEN Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Establishing a No Action Letter Process
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions Financial Crime Fighters’ Huge Tech Revamp Is More Urgent Than Ever. Here’s What’s Needed to Finish It
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Recommends Changes to Suspicious Activity Report Sharing Pilot Program to Encourage Participation
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Responds to FinCEN Request for Comment on Renewal of Foreign Financial Agent Transaction Reporting
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Comments on FinCEN Review of Bank Secrecy Act Regulations and Guidance
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Supports FinCEN Effort to Stem Shell-Company-Enabled Money Laundering
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI Response to Federal Reserve Vice Chair Barr’s Statements on Bank Capital Requirements
Supervision & Enforcement FDIC’s Proposed Changes to Supervisory Appeals System Fall Short of Progress
Supervision & Enforcement BPI and Trade Coalition Comment on FDIC Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations