The Clearing House Association submitted an unsolicited comment letter to the FASB in advance of the February 11 FASB Board meeting at which they would be redeliberating their ‘Financial Instruments – Credit Losses’ proposal and potentially expanding current disclosure requirements by requiring additional tables that would require entities to track financial assets by date of origination (i.e., vintage disclosures). The TCH letter urged FASB to consider alternatives to this approach, such as enhancing existing credit quality disclosures including, where appropriate, requiring additional disclosures of certain higher risk loan portfolios. At the February 11 Board meeting, the Board decided to proceed with expanded disclosures without an exposure draft by requiring balances to be disaggregated based on originations, but did indicate they will be performing extended outreach about vintage disclosures.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Cybersecurity Financial Trades Call for Accessible, Functional and Simple Cyber Incident Reporting Rules
Security BPI Comments on NYDFS Proposal on Cybersecurity Requirements for Financial Services Companies
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Comments to Banking Agencies on Reporting of Notional Pool Balances on Schedule RC-O of the Call Reports
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI and IIB Comment on Federal Reserve Proposal to Revise FR Y-7Q Capital and Asset Report for Foreign Bank Organizations
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Comments on Fed Proposal to Revise Structure Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for Domestic and Foreign Banking Organizations
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI Response to Federal Reserve Vice Chair Barr’s Statements on Bank Capital Requirements
Supervision & Enforcement FDIC’s Proposed Changes to Supervisory Appeals System Fall Short of Progress
Supervision & Enforcement BPI and Trade Coalition Comment on FDIC Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations