The Clearing House Association submitted an unsolicited comment letter to the FASB in advance of the February 11 FASB Board meeting at which they would be redeliberating their ‘Financial Instruments – Credit Losses’ proposal and potentially expanding current disclosure requirements by requiring additional tables that would require entities to track financial assets by date of origination (i.e., vintage disclosures). The TCH letter urged FASB to consider alternatives to this approach, such as enhancing existing credit quality disclosures including, where appropriate, requiring additional disclosures of certain higher risk loan portfolios. At the February 11 Board meeting, the Board decided to proceed with expanded disclosures without an exposure draft by requiring balances to be disaggregated based on originations, but did indicate they will be performing extended outreach about vintage disclosures.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting
BPI and Coalition of Trades Oppose PCAOB’s Proposed Changes to Auditing Standards
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting
BPI Comments on Banking Agencies’ Proposed Revisions to Call Reports and FR Y-9
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting
BPI Comments on CFPB’s Proposed Registry of Nonbank Covered Persons Subject to Certain Agency and Court Orders
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting
BPI Responds to NYDFS Request for Comments Concerning Presumption of Control of NY-Charted or Licensed Institutions
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing
U.S. Bank Capital Levels: Aligning With or Exceeding Midpoint Estimates of Optimal
Central Bank Digital Currency
BPI’s Paige Pidano Paridon Testifies on CBDC Before House Subcommittee