The Clearing House Association submitted an unsolicited comment letter to the FSB Data Requirements Workstream regarding the proposed collection of granular and comparable G-SIB balance sheet data. The letter expresses concerns that the proposal and template contain a number of impractical elements and insufficiently balance the costs of obtaining such data with the potential supervisory benefits. Amongst other things, the letter urges the FSB to phase in the reporting requirements so that G-SIBs would only be required to report exposures to five countries and two currencies for the first two years of reporting. The comment letter also supports the required number of countries never exceeding a maximum of 10 (the proposal currently requires 35) and also supports the notion of banks being permitted to report on the basis of their respective local accounting standards.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI and Coalition of Trades Oppose PCAOB’s Proposed Changes to Auditing Standards
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Comments on Banking Agencies’ Proposed Revisions to Call Reports and FR Y-9
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Comments on CFPB’s Proposed Registry of Nonbank Covered Persons Subject to Certain Agency and Court Orders
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Responds to NYDFS Request for Comments Concerning Presumption of Control of NY-Charted or Licensed Institutions
Security BPI and SIFMA Respond to NYDFS Proposal on Cybersecurity Requirements for Financial Services Companies
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing U.S. Bank Capital Levels: Aligning With or Exceeding Midpoint Estimates of Optimal
Central Bank Digital Currency BPI’s Paige Pidano Paridon Testifies on CBDC Before House Subcommittee
Bank Activities and Structure BPI Statement Before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion
Bank Activities and Structure BPI Statement Before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Monetary Policy