TCH has filed a comment letter responding to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s (BCBS) proposal on prudential treatment of problem assets – definitions of non-performing exposures and forbearance. TCH is concerned that the proposal will affect current accounting and financial statement disclosure requirements, even though that is not necessarily the intended result. Therefore, TCH argues that the proposed definitions should be revised to align more closely with credit risk management practices to avoid creating an entirely new framework that may impact U.S. GAAP and IFRS financial statements without a corresponding improvement in credit risk measurements.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Submits Comment Letter to FinCEN Regarding AML Program Effectiveness
Bank Governance BPI Offers Recommendations to NY Financial Services Regulator on a Re-Proposed Regulation on Disclosure of Confidential Supervisory Information
Cybersecurity BPI Files Comment Letter with U.K. Banking Authorities in Response to Operational Resilience Proposals
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Submits Comment Letter to Banking Agencies on Revisions to Call Report
Consumer Affairs BPI Joins Joint Coalition Comment Letter Responding to CFPB NPR on General Qualified Mortgage Definition
More Posts by This Author
FinTech & Innovation FinTech and Big Tech Companies Want the Benefits of Banking Without the Responsibilities. Regulatory Loopholes Could Let Them Succeed.
COVID-19 Relief BPI and Joint Coalition Urge House and Senate Leadership to Address PPP Forgiveness Process
Bank Capital and Stress Testing The Farmer and the Seed Corn: Why Lowering the CCyB and Imposing Dividend Restrictions Are Opposites
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions FinCEN Should Focus on Flexibility, Clarity and Coordination When Defining AML Effectiveness
COVID-19 Relief Loan Necessity Questionnaires -Borrower & Lender Coalition Letter to Congressional Leadership