The Clearing House Association (TCH) along with the American Bankers Association and the Institute of International Bankers submitted a letter to the FDIC commenting on the FDIC’s January 2015 guidance and FAQs about what constitutes a ‘brokered deposit’. The letter expresses concern about the potential over-breadth of the guidance and requests that the FDIC clarify various items, principal among which is that deposits should not be considered brokered if they result from client‐servicing activities performed by dual, contract, and affiliate employees in connection with those employees’ providing a “one stop shop,” full‐service banking experience to customers, where the employees’ compensation is not directly or explicitly tied in any material respect to the volume of deposits placed.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Fed Account Access BPI Statement on FTX Implosion and Risks of Crypto Firms Obtaining Fed Account Access
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI Response to Federal Reserve Vice Chair Barr’s Statements on Bank Capital Requirements
Supervision & Enforcement FDIC’s Proposed Changes to Supervisory Appeals System Fall Short of Progress
Supervision & Enforcement BPI and Trade Coalition Comment on FDIC Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations