This paper is the second in a series to take a deep dive into the fundamental issues that underlie the “Too Big to Fail” debate. The paper examines whether large banks benefit disproportionately from federal deposit insurance and liquidity programs, or from the various types of extraordinary support provided by the U.S. government in response to the historic challenge facing the economy in 2008-09.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Monetary Policy The Fact that Big Banks’ Stock Prices Got Hammered This Spring Hardly Proves They are TBTF
Resolution & Recovery Planning Putting “Too Big to Fail” to Rest: Evidence from Market Behavior in the COVID-19 Pandemic
Bank Capital and Stress Testing FSB Report Finds That Too-Big-To-Fail Reforms Have Been Successful, but Costs Are Material
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing TCH Study Estimates Annual Cost of Regulatory Compliance for U.S. G-SIBs
Systemic Risk & TBTF New Study on Bank Bond Spreads Finds No Evidence of TBTF Effects on Large Bank Funding Costs