This paper is the second in a series to take a deep dive into the fundamental issues that underlie the “Too Big to Fail” debate. The paper examines whether large banks benefit disproportionately from federal deposit insurance and liquidity programs, or from the various types of extraordinary support provided by the U.S. government in response to the historic challenge facing the economy in 2008-09.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Resolution & Recovery Planning New Large Bank Resolution Requirements Would Be Costly and Unnecessary
Systemic Risk & TBTF U.K. Pension Fund Debacle Illustrates How Government-Created Moral Hazard Can Lead to Systemic Risk
Bank Liquidity Imposition of SPOE and TLAC Requirements on Large Regional Banks is Unnecessary to Promote Financial Stability
Bank Liquidity Applying Global Bank Resolution Rules to Regional Banks Would Undermine Bipartisan Tailoring Efforts, Increase Costs for Borrowers and Produce No Tangible Public Benefit
Mergers and Acquisitions On Bank Mergers, the Benefits of a Competitive Industry Are Clear and the Regulatory Standards Are Appropriately Stringent
Bank Activities and Structure How To Measure The Change In Financial Stability Risk Resulting From A Merger: Some Technical Considerations.
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing TCH Study Estimates Annual Cost of Regulatory Compliance for U.S. G-SIBs
Systemic Risk & TBTF New Study on Bank Bond Spreads Finds No Evidence of TBTF Effects on Large Bank Funding Costs