The Clearing House joined other trades in a comment letter responding to the May 6 FSB Data Gaps Initiative statement on Launch of Phase 2 funding template and Quantitative Impact Analysis (QIA) for Phase 3. While the associations expressed their gratitude for FSB’s industry outreach on this initiative, the letter sought clarity on the timing and sequencing of the Phase 2 templates and Phase 3 QIA. Additionally, the letter commented on: (i) the consistency of amounts to be reported, (ii) the reporting criteria of the memo items, and (iii) the confidentiality of data submitted for Data-Hub purposes.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI and Coalition of Trades Oppose PCAOB’s Proposed Changes to Auditing Standards
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Comments on Banking Agencies’ Proposed Revisions to Call Reports and FR Y-9
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Comments on CFPB’s Proposed Registry of Nonbank Covered Persons Subject to Certain Agency and Court Orders
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Responds to NYDFS Request for Comments Concerning Presumption of Control of NY-Charted or Licensed Institutions
Security BPI and SIFMA Respond to NYDFS Proposal on Cybersecurity Requirements for Financial Services Companies
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing U.S. Bank Capital Levels: Aligning With or Exceeding Midpoint Estimates of Optimal