The Clearing House joined other trades in a comment letter responding to the May 6 FSB Data Gaps Initiative statement on Launch of Phase 2 funding template and Quantitative Impact Analysis (QIA) for Phase 3. While the associations expressed their gratitude for FSB’s industry outreach on this initiative, the letter sought clarity on the timing and sequencing of the Phase 2 templates and Phase 3 QIA. Additionally, the letter commented on: (i) the consistency of amounts to be reported, (ii) the reporting criteria of the memo items, and (iii) the confidentiality of data submitted for Data-Hub purposes.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Submits Comment Letter to FinCEN Regarding AML Program Effectiveness
Bank Governance BPI Offers Recommendations to NY Financial Services Regulator on a Re-Proposed Regulation on Disclosure of Confidential Supervisory Information
Cybersecurity BPI Files Comment Letter with U.K. Banking Authorities in Response to Operational Resilience Proposals
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Submits Comment Letter to Banking Agencies on Revisions to Call Report
Consumer Affairs BPI Joins Joint Coalition Comment Letter Responding to CFPB NPR on General Qualified Mortgage Definition
More Posts by This Author
FinTech & Innovation FinTech and Big Tech Companies Want the Benefits of Banking Without the Responsibilities. Regulatory Loopholes Could Let Them Succeed.
COVID-19 Relief BPI and Joint Coalition Urge House and Senate Leadership to Address PPP Forgiveness Process
Bank Capital and Stress Testing The Farmer and the Seed Corn: Why Lowering the CCyB and Imposing Dividend Restrictions Are Opposites
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions FinCEN Should Focus on Flexibility, Clarity and Coordination When Defining AML Effectiveness
COVID-19 Relief Loan Necessity Questionnaires -Borrower & Lender Coalition Letter to Congressional Leadership