The Clearing House joined other trades in a comment letter responding to the May 6 FSB Data Gaps Initiative statement on Launch of Phase 2 funding template and Quantitative Impact Analysis (QIA) for Phase 3. While the associations expressed their gratitude for FSB’s industry outreach on this initiative, the letter sought clarity on the timing and sequencing of the Phase 2 templates and Phase 3 QIA. Additionally, the letter commented on: (i) the consistency of amounts to be reported, (ii) the reporting criteria of the memo items, and (iii) the confidentiality of data submitted for Data-Hub purposes.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Response to FDIC Resolution Plans Required for Insured Depository Institutions With $100 Billion or More in Total Assets
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Recommends Call Report Changes to Address Troubled Debt Restructuring
Cybersecurity Redundant Reporting Stresses Banks’ Cybersecurity Readiness, Warrants White House Review
Cybersecurity BPI and ABA Recommend Office of the National Cyber Director Harmonize Cyber Regulations
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI and Coalition of Trades Oppose PCAOB’s Proposed Changes to Auditing Standards
More Posts by This Author
Basel Finalization The Empire Strikes Back: How the Basel Proposal Would Shift Credit Allocation from the Private Sector to the Government
Consumer Affairs Banks Support National Strategy to Identify Opportunities and Barriers to Financial Inclusion
Bank Liquidity BPI Statement for the Record for House Hearing on the Fed Discount Window and Emergency Lending