The Clearing House Association (TCH) and SIFMA filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit arguing that extender statutes that are expressly limited to “statutes of limitations” for state law “contract” and “tort” claims should be construed in accordance with their plain language and the Supreme Court’s prior rulings and thus should not apply to statutes of repose.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs BPI Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of HOLA Preemption to Successor Banks in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase
More Posts by This Author
COVID-19 Relief BPI and Coalition of Trades Advocate for Economic Impact Payment Protections in American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
Consumer Affairs BPI and Coalition of Trades Submit Letter to OCC in Response to CRA Information Collection Survey