The Clearing House (TCH) along with SIFMA and the FSR filed an amicus brief with the SCOTUS in support of petitioners in Bank of America v. Gelboim. The underlying litigation arose out of the process for setting USD LIBOR, and the petition raises the questions of whether: (i) antitrust claims (indeed, claims premised on categorical per se liability) can proceed even where the alleged harm does not flow from any restraint of trade or anticompetitive effect; and (ii) under Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, a plaintiff may plead an antitrust conspiracy based on alleged conduct that is equally indicative of parallel, non-conspiratorial activity. The Associations’ brief argues that (i) noncompetitive benchmarks, such as LIBOR, should not be treated as prices under antitrust laws, (ii) the Second Circuit expanded potential antitrust liability for standard setting programs by holding that mere participation in setting a benchmark was sufficient to infer participation in an antitrust conspiracy, and (iii) the combination of expanded price-fixing and conspiracy liability will chill efficiency-enhancing benchmarks and other standard-setting agreements.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs BPI Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of HOLA Preemption to Successor Banks in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase
More Posts by This Author
Bank Conditions and Credit Availability Time To Return To the Regular Rulebook – Economic Uncertainty Is Not Extraordinarily Elevated
COVID-19 Relief BPI and Coalition of Trades Advocate for Economic Impact Payment Protections in American Rescue Plan Act of 2021