The Clearing House Association submitted a comment letter to the BCBS focused on the financial accounting and reporting aspects of their consultative document titled “Guidance on Accounting for Expected Credit Losses.” TCH generally applauds the efforts of the BCBS in issuing guidance to reinforce and enhance sound credit risk practices as they relate to accounting, and particularly supports the principles-based accounting approach generally taken in the Proposal. Because, however, a final expected credit losses standard has yet to be released in the U.S., we believe this guidance is premature and should be reissued as a formal NPR by the U.S. standard setting agencies following implementation of an expected credit losses standard in the U.S. TCH also notes several other areas of concern, including: (i) inputs/assumptions used in developing regulatory capital should not necessarily be the same as those used for accounting measures, (ii) the use of practical expedients should be permitted, and (iii) all disclosure requirements should take into account current requirements by domestic standard setters.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Submits Comment Letter to Banking Agencies on Revisions to Call Report
Bank Capital and Stress Testing Some Thoughts on the Bank Regulatory Picture: Dividends, CECL, Buffers and the Rest
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Submits Comment Letter to Agencies on Call Report and FFIEC 101 Reporting Revisions
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Submits Comment Letter to the Fed on Proposed FR Y-9 Reporting Revisions
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI Symposium on the Current Expected Credit Loss Accounting Standard
More Posts by This Author
Bank Conditions and Credit Availability Time To Return To the Regular Rulebook – Economic Uncertainty Is Not Extraordinarily Elevated
COVID-19 Relief BPI and Coalition of Trades Advocate for Economic Impact Payment Protections in American Rescue Plan Act of 2021