The Clearing House Association (TCH) filed a comment letter with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) on its proposed rule regarding changes to the deposit insurance assessment calculation methodology. In the letter, TCH reiterates its support for maintaining a robust federal deposit insurance fund (DIF), but expresses concern that the proposed rule is inconsistent with the statutory requirement that assessments be based on actual risk to the DIF. TCH also argues that adhering to the risk-based statutory mandate is essential for multiple reasons: it promotes the integrity of the DIF; it discourages excessive or undue risk-taking; it avoids subsidies; it is more fair; and it is consistent with the fundamental principles of insurance. TCH also provides a number of suggestions intended to make the changes to the assessment methodology more risk-based, including recommended changes that would: (i) permit the recognition of collateral in measuring counterparty exposure, consistent with the standardized approach adopted in the capital rules, (ii) more appropriately reflect treatment of exposures to certain kinds of CCPs, and (iii) retain the option to use an internal model methodology, which is arguably a much more risk-sensitive way to measure counterparty exposure.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Fed Account Access BPI Statement on FTX Implosion and Risks of Crypto Firms Obtaining Fed Account Access
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI Response to Federal Reserve Vice Chair Barr’s Statements on Bank Capital Requirements
Supervision & Enforcement FDIC’s Proposed Changes to Supervisory Appeals System Fall Short of Progress
Supervision & Enforcement BPI and Trade Coalition Comment on FDIC Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations