TCH, the ABA, and CBA filed an amicus with the SCOTUS in support of the respondent, Santander Consumer USA, in Henson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. The issue at hand is the application of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) to debt purchasers (whose principal business purpose is not debt collection). In the amicus, the Associations argue that (i) Congress, in enacting the FDCPA, did not attempt to apply the statute to all purchasers of debt; (ii) the FDCPA applies only to a specifically defined group of “debt collectors;” and (iii) the Fourth Circuit correctly held that entities like Santander, whose principal business is the origination of loans and who also purchase debt and seek to collect it for their own accounts, are excluded from coverage under the FDCPA. Additionally, the Associations argue that: (i) financial institutions like Santander that provide consumer services are already subject to separate and effective regulatory regimes; and (ii) reversal would increase the costs in the debt sale and origination markets, thereby harming the financial system and consumers.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI, Trades File Brief Supporting BofA Argument that National Law Preempts N.Y. Mortgage Escrow Rate Requirements
Amicus Briefs BPI, Joint Trades File Amici Brief in Goldman Shareholder Class Action Case Before SCOTUS
Consumer Affairs BPI Files Joint Amici Brief With Other Trades in California v. OCC Case on the OCC’s ‘Madden Fix’ Regulation
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs BPI Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of HOLA Preemption to Successor Banks in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI Response to Federal Reserve Vice Chair Barr’s Statements on Bank Capital Requirements
Supervision & Enforcement FDIC’s Proposed Changes to Supervisory Appeals System Fall Short of Progress
Supervision & Enforcement BPI and Trade Coalition Comment on FDIC Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations