The Clearing House (TCH) joined the IIB, NYBA, and the European Banking Federation in an amicus brief before the New York Court of Appeals in Motorola Credit Corp. v. Standard Chartered Bank. The brief argues that New York’s traditional rule (i.e., that each office of a bank should be treated as a separate bank) should be retained because subjecting international banks to global service of process in attachment and garnishment orders would force them to choose between conflicting laws. In addition, the brief argues that the rule should be retained because it is consistent with the presumption against extraterritorial application of New York law, and could impose unconstitutional double liability on global banks otherwise. The brief also argues that the separate-entity rule benefits New York because it allows foreign banks to participate in the New York markets through branches rather than separately incorporated subsidiaries.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI, Trades File Brief Supporting BofA Argument that National Law Preempts N.Y. Mortgage Escrow Rate Requirements
Amicus Briefs BPI, Joint Trades File Amici Brief in Goldman Shareholder Class Action Case Before SCOTUS
Consumer Affairs BPI Files Joint Amici Brief With Other Trades in California v. OCC Case on the OCC’s ‘Madden Fix’ Regulation
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs BPI Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of HOLA Preemption to Successor Banks in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI Response to Federal Reserve Vice Chair Barr’s Statements on Bank Capital Requirements
Supervision & Enforcement FDIC’s Proposed Changes to Supervisory Appeals System Fall Short of Progress
Supervision & Enforcement BPI and Trade Coalition Comment on FDIC Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations