TCH and SIFMA filed an amicus brief supporting defendants’ appeal in FHFA v. Nomura Holding America Inc. The brief supports defendant’s argument that the Extender Statute should be construed in accordance with its plain language and the Supreme Court’s prior rulings and thus should not apply to statutes of repose, federal claims, or statutory claims (whether federal or State). The brief also supports defendant’s arguments that the district court misapplied the “reasonable care” and “loss causation” defenses under federal and state securities laws, which, if upheld, would impose unprecedented risks and burdens not contemplated by those statutes.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI, Trades File Brief Supporting BofA Argument that National Law Preempts N.Y. Mortgage Escrow Rate Requirements
Amicus Briefs BPI, Joint Trades File Amici Brief in Goldman Shareholder Class Action Case Before SCOTUS
Consumer Affairs BPI Files Joint Amici Brief With Other Trades in California v. OCC Case on the OCC’s ‘Madden Fix’ Regulation
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs BPI Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of HOLA Preemption to Successor Banks in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase
More Posts by This Author
Digital Assets BPI Comments on Treasury Department Review of Digital Assets in Response to Executive Order
Community Reinvestment Act BPI Comments on Federal Banking Agencies’ Community Reinvestment Act Proposal
Bank Liquidity The Bank of England Just Released Its Plan for Getting Smaller. The Fed Could Learn from it.