The Clearing House Association (TCH) and SIFMA argue that the FDIC Extender Statute extends only the “statute of limitations” for the FDIC’s state-law “contract” and “tort” claims, and not the statute of repose for its Securities Act claims.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI, Trades File Brief Supporting BofA Argument that National Law Preempts N.Y. Mortgage Escrow Rate Requirements
Amicus Briefs BPI, Joint Trades File Amici Brief in Goldman Shareholder Class Action Case Before SCOTUS
Consumer Affairs BPI Files Joint Amici Brief With Other Trades in California v. OCC Case on the OCC’s ‘Madden Fix’ Regulation
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs BPI Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of HOLA Preemption to Successor Banks in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase
More Posts by This Author
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI’s Heather Hogsett Testifies Before House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, CISA’s Contributions
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions FinCEN Must Preserve Beneficial Ownership Data Usefulness, Discourage Inappropriate Reporting Omissions
Bank Activities and Structure Silicon Valley Bank Would Have Passed The Liquidity Coverage Ratio Requirement