The Clearing House Association (TCH) and the Loan Syndications and Trading Association (LSTA) filed an amicus brief in the Second Circuit in support of JPMorgan’s petition for a rehearing or rehearing en banc for the court to reconsider a panel decision that unsettles bedrock principles of agency law that limit a principal’s liability for its agent’s unauthorized acts. The panel decision found JPMorgan liable for its agent’s unauthorized conduct in releasing collateral securing a particular syndicated loan. The brief highlights the critical importance of the ability of syndicate lenders to rely on the limits set forth in their formal agreements to restrict their agents’ authority to act on their behalf. If this fundamental principle of agency law is overturned, principals will be forced to incur significant costs to monitor the conduct of their agents, thereby undermining the efficiency of the loan syndication market, a key source of financing for many job-creating large and middle market companies in the United States, and needlessly increasing the risks associated with those loans.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI, Trades File Brief Supporting BofA Argument that National Law Preempts N.Y. Mortgage Escrow Rate Requirements
Amicus Briefs BPI, Joint Trades File Amici Brief in Goldman Shareholder Class Action Case Before SCOTUS
Consumer Affairs BPI Files Joint Amici Brief With Other Trades in California v. OCC Case on the OCC’s ‘Madden Fix’ Regulation
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs BPI Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of HOLA Preemption to Successor Banks in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI Response to Federal Reserve Vice Chair Barr’s Statements on Bank Capital Requirements
Supervision & Enforcement FDIC’s Proposed Changes to Supervisory Appeals System Fall Short of Progress
Supervision & Enforcement BPI and Trade Coalition Comment on FDIC Guidelines for Appeals of Material Supervisory Determinations