The Clearing House (TCH) and the ABA have filed a comment letter on the BCBS’s consultative document proposing a consolidated and enhanced framework with respect to Pillar 3 disclosure requirements. In the letter, the Associations agree that robust Pillar 3 disclosure requirements are appropriate and necessary, but they identify several concerns with the proposed enhancements, notably: (i) elements of the proposal related to regulatory requirements that are not yet finalized should be deferred until such requirements are finalized; (ii) the tables and templates should be revised to avoid requiring disclosure of proprietary and market-sensitive information; (iii) the BCBS should explicitly provide national supervisory discretion for implementation of pillar 3 disclosure requirements; (iv) the BCBS should provide the opportunity for comments on a holistic basis; and (v) signposting should be supported where appropriate to avoid confusing, duplicative public reports.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Bank Capital and Stress Testing Basel Finalization: The History and Implications for Capital Regulation – Part III
Bank Capital and Stress Testing Basel Finalization: The History and Implications for Capital Regulation – Part II
Bank Capital and Stress Testing Basel Finalization: The History and Implications for Capital Regulation – Part I
More Posts by This Author
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI’s Heather Hogsett Testifies Before House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, CISA’s Contributions
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions FinCEN Must Preserve Beneficial Ownership Data Usefulness, Discourage Inappropriate Reporting Omissions