BPI, SIFMA, ABA, FSF and IIB this week urged the Federal Reserve to clarify several areas of the proposed liquidity reporting changes that would be used to help monitor the liquidity positions of large, globally interconnected banks. The Fed’s proposed revisions to the Complex Institution Liquidity Monitoring Report are meant to capture details of banks’ funding flows that impact a long-term liquidity risk measure, the recently finalized Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR). Banks must comply with the NSFR, a regulatory liquidity measure requiring banks to hold adequate stable funding to support their assets, commitments and derivatives exposures over a one-year time horizon, beginning on July 1, 2021. However, the proposed changes far exceed the scope of those required by the NSFR, the trades wrote in a comment letter filed May 27. Also, the Fed’s data-reporting changes will likely be finalized close to the NSFR effective date, leaving banks insufficient time to make the necessary and significant changes to their reporting systems.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Cybersecurity Financial Trades Call for Accessible, Functional and Simple Cyber Incident Reporting Rules
Security BPI Comments on NYDFS Proposal on Cybersecurity Requirements for Financial Services Companies
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Comments to Banking Agencies on Reporting of Notional Pool Balances on Schedule RC-O of the Call Reports
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI and IIB Comment on Federal Reserve Proposal to Revise FR Y-7Q Capital and Asset Report for Foreign Bank Organizations
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Comments on Fed Proposal to Revise Structure Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for Domestic and Foreign Banking Organizations
More Posts by This Author
Industrial Loan Company Financial Services and Consumer Groups Support Senate Bill to Close Industrial Loan Company Loophole
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI Response to Federal Reserve Vice Chair Barr’s Statements on Bank Capital Requirements
Supervision & Enforcement FDIC’s Proposed Changes to Supervisory Appeals System Fall Short of Progress