On July 17, Greg Baer will testify before the Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit Subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee on the state of capital regulation. At the hearing, entitled “Examining Capital Regimes for Financial Institutions,” Baer identified three problems with current capital requirements: they are set too high, subject to too much volatility, and too prescriptive. In his testimony, Baer noted that there is “little analysis based on any absolute or historical standard that banks are undercapitalized” then sited several potential areas for regulatory reform. His testimony can be viewed by accessing the link below.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Bank Capital and Stress Testing The Farmer and the Seed Corn: Why Lowering the CCyB and Imposing Dividend Restrictions Are Opposites
Bank Capital and Stress Testing The Federal Reserve’s Capital Buffer Framework Effectively Constrains Bank Dividends in Stress
More Posts by This Author
FinTech & Innovation FinTech and Big Tech Companies Want the Benefits of Banking Without the Responsibilities. Regulatory Loopholes Could Let Them Succeed.
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Endorses Legislative Compromise to Reform Anti-Money Laundering Framework and End Anonymous Shell Companies
Bank Activities and Structure BPI Asks OCC to Furnish Data Used to Support Rushed Fair Access Proposal in FOIA Request