On March 21, BPI submitted a comment letter to the Financial Stability Board on the effects of financial regulatory reforms on the provision of financing to small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The letter presents evidence to show that post-crisis regulatory reforms have significantly curtailed the provisioning of credit to SMEs, with the largest demonstrable impacts in the U.S. appearing to result from the implementation of stress testing and the GSIB capital surcharge framework, the latter of which was developed as an international standard, although it has been implemented more stringently in the U.S. The letter also notes that, while other nonbank institutions may have increased the supply of credit to SMEs in the post-crisis period, research has shown that there is a significant net reduction in the supply of credit to SMEs.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Basel Finalization The Empire Strikes Back: How the Basel Proposal Would Shift Credit Allocation from the Private Sector to the Government
Consumer Affairs Banks Support National Strategy to Identify Opportunities and Barriers to Financial Inclusion
Basel Finalization BPI’s Greg Baer Testifies on Basel Proposal Before House Financial Services Subcommittee
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI CEO Testifies Before House Subcommittee on Basel Endgame Capital Proposal
Basel Finalization Joint BPI, ABA Comment Letter: Basel Proposal’s Costs to U.S. Economy Outweigh Any Benefits
More Posts by This Author
Security BPI and Joint Trades Comment on FCC’s Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Illegal Text Messages
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Supports Call Report Revisions to Improve Securities Reporting Consistency