On November 29, BPI submitted a response to the Financial Action Task Force’s (“FATF”) public consultation on its Draft Guidance on Digital Identity, which is aimed at clarifying “how digital ID systems can be used to conduct certain elements of customer due diligence” (CDD) at regulated entities under the FATF’s anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) recommendations. BPI affirmed banks’ commitment to preventing illicit financial activity and expressed support for the FATF’s view that digital ID has the potential to strengthen AML/CFT and CDD controls, increase financial inclusion, improve customer experience and reduce costs for regulated entities. BPI stated that fundamental components will need to be addressed by both the public and private sectors before adoption for AML/CFT and sanctions compliance, including information collection expectations necessary to confirm identity, verification mechanisms, procedures for updating and retaining information, consumer privacy and data security protections, audit processes, expectations for using digital IDs in ongoing monitoring and, as necessary, the ability to rely on third-party or other providers. Furthermore, it stated that regulated entities should be included in all government-sponsored digital ID assessment discussions, so as to ensure harmonized and consistent global approach to digital ID standards.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI’s Heather Hogsett Testifies Before House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, CISA’s Contributions
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions FinCEN Must Preserve Beneficial Ownership Data Usefulness, Discourage Inappropriate Reporting Omissions
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Responds to FinCEN Request for Comments Regarding Beneficial Ownership Information Reports
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions Russian Oligarchs Hide Money in U.S. Only Reliable Data Can Stop Them.
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Comments on FinCEN Proposed Rulemaking on Access to and Safeguards for Beneficial Ownership Information
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions Business-Ownership Registry Access Rules Should Ensure Banks Can Focus on Threats
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI and ABA Respond to FinCEN Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Establishing a No Action Letter Process
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing U.S. Bank Capital Levels: Aligning With or Exceeding Midpoint Estimates of Optimal
Central Bank Digital Currency BPI’s Paige Pidano Paridon Testifies on CBDC Before House Subcommittee
Bank Activities and Structure BPI Statement Before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion
Bank Activities and Structure BPI Statement Before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Monetary Policy