On August 2, BPI and the Financial Services Forum submitted comment letters to the Financial Stability Board (FSB) on discussion papers regarding i) the solvent wind-down of derivatives and trading portfolios and ii) public disclosures on resolution planning and resolvability. The full letters can be found below.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Bank Activities and Structure The FDIC’s Proposed Increase in Deposit Insurance Assessments May Be Based On Incorrect Projections
Bank Liquidity Imposition of SPOE and TLAC Requirements on Large Regional Banks is Unnecessary to Promote Financial Stability
Bank Liquidity Applying Global Bank Resolution Rules to Regional Banks Would Undermine Bipartisan Tailoring Efforts, Increase Costs for Borrowers and Produce No Tangible Public Benefit
Resolution & Recovery Planning Any Major Revamp of Bank Resolution Plan Requirements Should be Done Only Through Rulemaking
Resolution & Recovery Planning Putting “Too Big to Fail” to Rest: Evidence from Market Behavior in the COVID-19 Pandemic
More Posts by This Author
Digital Assets BPI Comments on Treasury Department Review of Digital Assets in Response to Executive Order
Community Reinvestment Act BPI Comments on Federal Banking Agencies’ Community Reinvestment Act Proposal
Bank Liquidity The Bank of England Just Released Its Plan for Getting Smaller. The Fed Could Learn from it.