BPI, along with the Mortgage Bankers Association, American Bankers Association, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, and Western Bankers Association, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the U.S.Supreme Court in Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP. The brief, filed on Wednesday, argues that the procedural requirements of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) should not extend to enforcing a security interest in a non-judicial foreclosure. According to the brief, the FDCPA’s procedural requirements were enacted to address third-party collection of unsecured consumer debts rather than the process of mortgage foreclosure. Moreover, applying the FDCPA in the non-judicial foreclosure context would not provide meaningful protection for borrowers beyond the already-robust procedural protections of state and federal foreclosure law and would introduce unnecessary complexity in the foreclosure process, resulting in higher costs and burdens for both mortgage lenders and mortgage borrowers.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI, Trades File Brief Supporting BofA Argument that National Law Preempts N.Y. Mortgage Escrow Rate Requirements
Amicus Briefs BPI, Joint Trades File Amici Brief in Goldman Shareholder Class Action Case Before SCOTUS
Consumer Affairs BPI Files Joint Amici Brief With Other Trades in California v. OCC Case on the OCC’s ‘Madden Fix’ Regulation
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs BPI Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of HOLA Preemption to Successor Banks in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase
More Posts by This Author
Basel Finalization The Empire Strikes Back: How the Basel Proposal Would Shift Credit Allocation from the Private Sector to the Government
Consumer Affairs Banks Support National Strategy to Identify Opportunities and Barriers to Financial Inclusion
Bank Liquidity BPI Statement for the Record for House Hearing on the Fed Discount Window and Emergency Lending
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Statement for the Record for House Oversight Hearing of FinCEN and the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence