On March 15, BPI submitted an amicus brief to the Ninth Circuit in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase, supporting the view that Home Owners’ Loan Act (HOLA) preemption of conflicting state laws applies to a successor bank to the extent preemption applied at initiation of a loan originated by a federal savings association (FSA). Specifically, the brief offers several policy reasons why the U.S. Court of Appeals should hear an interlocutory appeal of the District Court’s opinion that HOLA preemption no longer applies to a loan upon its sale or transfer to a non-FSA successor bank.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs Joint Trades File Amici Brief In Support of Petition for U.S. Supreme Court Review of National Bank Act Preemption to a California State Law
More Posts by This Author
Bank Conditions and Credit Availability Time To Return To the Regular Rulebook – Economic Uncertainty Is Not Extraordinarily Elevated
COVID-19 Relief BPI and Coalition of Trades Advocate for Economic Impact Payment Protections in American Rescue Plan Act of 2021