On January 23, BPI submitted a motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District Court of Illinois in US v. Vorley and Chanu. The Court granted BPI’s motion on January 24, and the amicus curiae brief was filed on February 6. The motion encourages the court to reaffirm appropriate limits on wire fraud liability under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, noting that actions that do not involve a false or misleading statement cannot be prosecuted under the wire fraud law, which requires proof of a material factual misrepresentation.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI, Trades File Brief Supporting BofA Argument that National Law Preempts N.Y. Mortgage Escrow Rate Requirements
Amicus Briefs BPI, Joint Trades File Amici Brief in Goldman Shareholder Class Action Case Before SCOTUS
Consumer Affairs BPI Files Joint Amici Brief With Other Trades in California v. OCC Case on the OCC’s ‘Madden Fix’ Regulation
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs BPI Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of HOLA Preemption to Successor Banks in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase
More Posts by This Author
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions FinCEN Must Preserve Beneficial Ownership Data Usefulness, Discourage Inappropriate Reporting Omissions
Bank Activities and Structure Silicon Valley Bank Would Have Passed The Liquidity Coverage Ratio Requirement