On November 30, BPI, together with the American Bankers Association, Housing Policy Council, U.S. Mortgage Insurers, and the Mortgage Bankers Association, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Blake v. JPMorgan Chase, encouraging the Court to reject the plaintiff’s attempt to dramatically expand the statute of limitations for private actions under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). The brief holds that alleged violations of RESPA’s prohibition on kickbacks accrue at settlement, giving borrowers one year from their loans’ closing to bring a claim. The plaintiff’s so-called “continuing violations doctrine,” by contrast, argues that each time a portion of an insurance premium is ceded to the captive reinsurer there is new kickback that gives rise to a new RESPA violation and restarts the statute of limitations.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Submits Comment Letter to FinCEN Regarding AML Program Effectiveness
Bank Governance BPI Offers Recommendations to NY Financial Services Regulator on a Re-Proposed Regulation on Disclosure of Confidential Supervisory Information
Cybersecurity BPI Files Comment Letter with U.K. Banking Authorities in Response to Operational Resilience Proposals
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Submits Comment Letter to Banking Agencies on Revisions to Call Report
Consumer Affairs BPI Joins Joint Coalition Comment Letter Responding to CFPB NPR on General Qualified Mortgage Definition
More Posts by This Author
Bank Capital and Stress Testing GSIB Method 2 Fixed Coefficients Must Be Adjusted for Economic Growth
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions BPI Endorses Legislative Compromise to Reform Anti-Money Laundering Framework and End Anonymous Shell Companies
Bank Activities and Structure BPI Asks OCC to Furnish Data Used to Support Rushed Fair Access Proposal in FOIA Request