On November 30, BPI, together with the American Bankers Association, Housing Policy Council, U.S. Mortgage Insurers, and the Mortgage Bankers Association, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Blake v. JPMorgan Chase, encouraging the Court to reject the plaintiff’s attempt to dramatically expand the statute of limitations for private actions under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). The brief holds that alleged violations of RESPA’s prohibition on kickbacks accrue at settlement, giving borrowers one year from their loans’ closing to bring a claim. The plaintiff’s so-called “continuing violations doctrine,” by contrast, argues that each time a portion of an insurance premium is ceded to the captive reinsurer there is new kickback that gives rise to a new RESPA violation and restarts the statute of limitations.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Amicus Briefs BPI, Trades File Brief Supporting BofA Argument that National Law Preempts N.Y. Mortgage Escrow Rate Requirements
Amicus Briefs BPI, Joint Trades File Amici Brief in Goldman Shareholder Class Action Case Before SCOTUS
Consumer Affairs BPI Files Joint Amici Brief With Other Trades in California v. OCC Case on the OCC’s ‘Madden Fix’ Regulation
Amicus Briefs BPI Submits Amicus Brief in Hymes v. Bank of America National Bank Act Preemption Case
Amicus Briefs BPI Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of HOLA Preemption to Successor Banks in McShannock v. JP Morgan Chase
More Posts by This Author
Consumer Affairs BPI Supports Innovation, Competition and Protection of Consumer Data in Section 1033 Rulemaking
Bank Capital and Stress Testing Basel Finalization: The History and Implications for Capital Regulation – Part 1
Resolution & Recovery Planning New Large Bank Resolution Requirements Would Be Costly and Unnecessary