On Nov. 16, BPI submitted a comment letter to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) on its proposed definition of AML program effectiveness. The letter recommends that FinCEN, in coordination with other regulatory agencies, provide institutions the flexibility to design AML programs that align with their business models. This flexibility, coupled with regulatory reforms, would empower banks to devote additional resources to working with law enforcement to address more serious crimes and would improve the utility of the information available to the law enforcement and intelligence communities. “Modifying the existing AML program requirements to allow for greater flexibility, clarity and coordination among agencies will dramatically improve effectiveness and benefit both the U.S. financial system and national security,” Angelena Bradfield, SVP of AML/BSA, Sanctions & Privacy at the Bank Policy Institute, said in a BPI statement Nov. 17. BPI and a coalition of financial trades also submitted an accompanying letter to FinCEN emphasizing many of these recommendations.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions
BPI’s Heather Hogsett Testifies Before House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, CISA’s Contributions
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions
FinCEN Must Preserve Beneficial Ownership Data Usefulness, Discourage Inappropriate Reporting Omissions
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions
Russian Oligarchs Hide Money in U.S. Only Reliable Data Can Stop Them.
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions
Business-Ownership Registry Access Rules Should Ensure Banks Can Focus on Threats
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions
BPI and ABA Respond to FinCEN Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Establishing a No Action Letter Process
AML, Bank Secrecy Act and Sanctions
Financial Crime Fighters’ Huge Tech Revamp Is More Urgent Than Ever. Here’s What’s Needed to Finish It
More Posts by This Author