BPI submitted a comment letter on July 13th in response to a recently released Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) interim final rule (IFR) authorizing remote national bank board and shareholder meetings. BPI’s comments, which focused on board of directors meetings, commended the agency for permitting national banks to provide for telephonic or electronic participation at board of directors meetings, noting that remote communications tools provide national banks with more flexibility in planning and holding director meetings; could permit greater director participation at these meetings for those participants not able to attend in person; and may reduce the costs, logistical constraints, and other burdens — as well as, in the current environment, health risks — associated with conducting in-person meetings. In response to a question posed for public comment, BPI, however, cautioned the agency against the issuance of any new OCC risk management standards to govern this telephonic or virtual participation. While BPI and its members recognize the critical importance of the continued integrity of board communications, national banks have extensive experience with risk-reduction tools that predate the current COVID-19 crisis.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Bank Governance BPI, Coalition of Trades Encourage Passage of ‘Improving Corporate Governance Through Diversity Act of 2021’
Bank Governance Cybersecurity: Emerging Challenges and Solutions for the Boards of Financial Services Companies
Bank Governance BPI Supports Increase To DIMIA Major Assets Prohibition Threshold in Comment Letter to Regulators
Bank Governance BPI Responds to OCC’s Request for Comment on Part 9 Information Collection Requirements
More Posts by This Author
Industrial Loan Company Financial Services and Consumer Groups Support Senate Bill to Close Industrial Loan Company Loophole
Bank Capital and Stress Testing BPI Response to Federal Reserve Vice Chair Barr’s Statements on Bank Capital Requirements
Supervision & Enforcement FDIC’s Proposed Changes to Supervisory Appeals System Fall Short of Progress