Recently, and in response to growing concerns about regulators’ overreliance on guidance, bank regulators and the BCFP importantly issued an Interagency Statement confirming that supervisory guidance does not have the force of law, and that bank examiners should not take enforcement actions based on supervisory guidance. The Interagency Statement, a promising step forward, reaffirms the status of guidance under existing law. The question is how it changes regulatory practice. To institutionalize this recognition, and particularly to promote its prompt and consistent observance by examiners and other agency personnel, the BPI and ABA are asking for regulators to formalize the Interagency Statement in the form of a binding regulation, so as to ensure it endures over time and is followed consistently across the country.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Bank Governance To Promote Bank Safety and Effective Governance, Bank Directors Must Be Able to Do Their Jobs
Bank Activities and Structure Our Assessment of the Federal Reserve’s Latest Semiannual Supervision and Regulation Report and Some Recommendations for Future Reports
Supervision & Enforcement BPI Response to FSOC Guidance on the Designation of Systemically Important Non-Banks
Silicon Valley Bank How Regulators Could Strengthen the Banking System Without Sacrificing the Economy
Silicon Valley Bank BPI’s Jeremy Newell Testifies on SVB Supervision Before House Oversight Committee
More Posts by This Author
Security BPI and Joint Trades Comment on FCC’s Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Illegal Text Messages
Regulatory Reporting and Accounting BPI Supports Call Report Revisions to Improve Securities Reporting Consistency