Recently, and in response to growing concerns about regulators’ overreliance on guidance, bank regulators and the BCFP importantly issued an Interagency Statement confirming that supervisory guidance does not have the force of law, and that bank examiners should not take enforcement actions based on supervisory guidance. The Interagency Statement, a promising step forward, reaffirms the status of guidance under existing law. The question is how it changes regulatory practice. To institutionalize this recognition, and particularly to promote its prompt and consistent observance by examiners and other agency personnel, the BPI and ABA are asking for regulators to formalize the Interagency Statement in the form of a binding regulation, so as to ensure it endures over time and is followed consistently across the country.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Supervision & Enforcement BPI Offers Recommendations to NY Financial Services Regulator on a Re-Proposed Regulation on Disclosure of Confidential Supervisory Information
Supervision & Enforcement Banking Regulators Respond to BPI and ABA’s Petition Codifying Guidance Is Nonbinding
Supervision & Enforcement BPI Responds to Fed, FDIC’s Request for Information on CAMELS Rating System
Bank Capital and Stress Testing Repo Markets, Examination Practice, the Fed’s Balance Sheet and a Really Interesting Speech by Vice Chair Quarles
More Posts by This Author
Bank Conditions and Credit Availability Time To Return To the Regular Rulebook – Economic Uncertainty Is Not Extraordinarily Elevated
COVID-19 Relief BPI and Coalition of Trades Advocate for Economic Impact Payment Protections in American Rescue Plan Act of 2021