Recently, and in response to growing concerns about regulators’ overreliance on guidance, bank regulators and the BCFP importantly issued an Interagency Statement confirming that supervisory guidance does not have the force of law, and that bank examiners should not take enforcement actions based on supervisory guidance. The Interagency Statement, a promising step forward, reaffirms the status of guidance under existing law. The question is how it changes regulatory practice. To institutionalize this recognition, and particularly to promote its prompt and consistent observance by examiners and other agency personnel, the BPI and ABA are asking for regulators to formalize the Interagency Statement in the form of a binding regulation, so as to ensure it endures over time and is followed consistently across the country.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Supervision & Enforcement BPI Comments on Financial Stability Board’s Report on Supervisory and Regulatory Approaches to Climate-related Risks
Consumer Affairs BPI and American Financial Services Association Comment on CFPB’s Exam Manual Changes
Supervision & Enforcement FDIC Keeps Public in the Dark on Appeals Process and Discards Due Process Protections
Bank Capital and Stress Testing A Modification to the Basel Committee’s Standardized Approach to Operational Risk
Supervision & Enforcement BPI and Coalition of Trades Comment on CFPB Adjudication Proceeding Practices
Bank Capital and Stress Testing Consistency in Risk Weights for Corporate Exposures Under the Standardized Approach
More Posts by This Author
Digital Assets BPI Comments on Treasury Department Review of Digital Assets in Response to Executive Order
Community Reinvestment Act BPI Comments on Federal Banking Agencies’ Community Reinvestment Act Proposal
Bank Liquidity The Bank of England Just Released Its Plan for Getting Smaller. The Fed Could Learn from it.