Recently, and in response to growing concerns about regulators’ overreliance on guidance, bank regulators and the BCFP importantly issued an Interagency Statement confirming that supervisory guidance does not have the force of law, and that bank examiners should not take enforcement actions based on supervisory guidance. The Interagency Statement, a promising step forward, reaffirms the status of guidance under existing law. The question is how it changes regulatory practice. To institutionalize this recognition, and particularly to promote its prompt and consistent observance by examiners and other agency personnel, the BPI and ABA are asking for regulators to formalize the Interagency Statement in the form of a binding regulation, so as to ensure it endures over time and is followed consistently across the country.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Bank Capital and Stress Testing Goldilocks and the Fourth Way: Assessing Credit Risk for Capital Purposes
Supervision & Enforcement BPI Offers Recommendations to NY Financial Services Regulator on a Re-Proposed Regulation on Disclosure of Confidential Supervisory Information
More Posts by This Author
Consumer Affairs The Time Is Now: 30 Best Bank Practices to Help Improve Outcomes In Black Communities
Security Vote on NDAA Cyber Amendment Signals House Commitment to Strengthening National Cybersecurity
Security OFAC’s Updated Advisory on Ransomware Wisely Manages Fine Line and Encourages Strong Cybersecurity Practices
Security Champion Consumers’ Ability to Access Their Financial Data, and Preserve Their Right to Security and Privacy
FinTech & Innovation BPI Statement Before House Task Force on Financial Technology on Consumer Consumers Access to Personal Financial Data