The Clearing House (TCH), SIFMA, and the FSR (Associations) filed a comment letter responding to the OCC’s proposal for formal Part 30 guidelines on large bank recovery planning requirements. Specifically, the OCC’s proposal would require any insured national bank, insured Federal savings association, or insured Federal branch of a foreign bank with average total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more to develop a recovery plan that describes options for responding to stress events. In the letter, the Associations write that: (i) the OCC should clarify banks’ ability to leverage content from capital plans, contingency funding plans, resolution plans, and parent company recovery plans; (ii) operational stress scenarios should only be relevant to recovery planning to the extent they will cause substantial financial distress to a bank if uncorrected, and recovery options should focus on restoring the bank’s financial strength; (iii) the guidelines should not require management and the board to recommend changes to the bank’s organizational and legal structure every year; (iv) the final guidelines should be tailored for smaller or less complex banks; (v) the final guidelines should clarify that recovery plans are not expected to be as detailed or lengthy as resolutions plans; (vi) each bank should have the discretion to determine when during the calendar year its recovery plan should be finalized, approved by its board, and made available to examiners; and (vii) the effective date of the guidelines should provide banks with a reasonable period of time to develop their initial plans, and should be staggered to facilitate sound implementation.
You Might Also Be Interested In...
Resolution & Recovery Planning Putting “Too Big to Fail” to Rest: Evidence from Market Behavior in the COVID-19 Pandemic
Resolution & Recovery Planning BPI, FSF Comment on FSB Solvent Wind-Down and Resolution Disclosure Consultations
Resolution & Recovery Planning BPI Submits Comment Letter to Fed, FDIC on Resolution Planning Requirements
Resolution & Recovery Planning BPI Joins SIFMA and ABA In Filing Comment Letter On Proposed Amendments to 165(D) Rule
Resolution & Recovery Planning BPI and SIFMA submitted a comment letter to the OCC on its proposal to raise the asset threshold for its national bank recovery planning requirements
More Posts by This Author
Bank Conditions and Credit Availability Time To Return To the Regular Rulebook – Economic Uncertainty Is Not Extraordinarily Elevated
COVID-19 Relief BPI and Coalition of Trades Advocate for Economic Impact Payment Protections in American Rescue Plan Act of 2021